{"id":183,"date":"2020-10-25T02:35:42","date_gmt":"2020-10-25T07:35:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mystae.org\/?p=183"},"modified":"2025-06-01T09:07:15","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T15:07:15","slug":"183","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/random-musings.org\/index.php\/2020\/10\/25\/183\/","title":{"rendered":"Tools and Rules"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">These are some basic principles I use to help sort through the various topics and suggested explanations. Using them can simplify discussions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center has-medium-font-size\">Occam\u2019s Razor<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">This principle is attributed to William of Occam. He said something like, \u201cdo not multiply entities unnecessarily.\u201d I prefer, \u201cKeep it simple.\u201d Choose the simplest explanation that covers all the facts. Don\u2019t add complications unless the facts require it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center has-medium-font-size\">Horses Before Zebras<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhen you hear hoofbeats, think of horses before zebras.\u201d This is similar to Occam\u2019s Razor. Consider the more familiar explanations first. Those hoofbeats might be zebras, but they\u2019re probably horses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center has-medium-font-size\">Lack of Evidence<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Lack of evidence is exactly that \u2013 insufficient evidence to make an informed decision or to support a claim. When evidence is lacking, there is no basis for any conclusions. It isn\u2019t proof of a conspiracy to suppress the information by Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big Science, Big Government, Big Brother \u2013 whoever. It just means we don\u2019t know enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Related to this is the fact that an absence of evidence does not prove that something does not exist.&nbsp; That is certainly a reasonable conclusion, but it is not proof.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center has-medium-font-size\">Lack of Certitude<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Some argue that if you can\u2019t prove a point, it must be false. Not so. At most, being unable to prove a point suggests that your belief is based more on faith than on solid reasoning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">The flip side of this is the idea that if you can&#8217;t disprove a point, it must therefore be true.&nbsp; Again, this isn&#8217;t the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center has-medium-font-size\">Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">The more unusual a claim, the more compelling the evidence must be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">If you tell me you have a dog, I\u2019ll believe you. Lots of people have dogs. If you tell me you\u2019ve got a dragon, I\u2019ll need some serious evidence before I\u2019ll believe you. Dogs are ordinary; little evidence is needed. Dragons are extraordinary. The evidence needs to be compelling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center has-medium-font-size\">Burden of Proof Is On the Claimant<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Whoever makes the claim needs to support it with evidence. It is fallacious to make a claim and then demand that others disprove it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">You see this a lot in science, when some would-be genius thinks he\u2019s found a new theory, and demands that scientists disprove it. When scientists don\u2019t respond, he claims they\u2019re afraid of the truth, or covering up, or some such bullshit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">If you make a claim, it\u2019s up to you to provide evidence to support it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center has-medium-font-size\">Ad Hominem Fallacy<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">This is a Latin phrase that means &#8220;to the man.&#8221;&nbsp; It refers to a fallacy where a respondent tries to refute a claim by commenting on the person making the claim, instead of the claim itself.&nbsp; Quite often this involves insults, but that isn&#8217;t always the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">This fallacy often arises with controversial events that people witness.&nbsp; Their evidence is sometimes dismissed because they&#8217;re not trained scientists.&nbsp; The evidence itself isn&#8217;t examined, which is where the fallacy arises.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>These are some basic principles I use to help sort through the various topics and suggested explanations. Using them can simplify discussions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-183","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/random-musings.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/random-musings.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/random-musings.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/random-musings.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/random-musings.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=183"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/random-musings.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1291,"href":"https:\/\/random-musings.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183\/revisions\/1291"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/random-musings.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/random-musings.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=183"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/random-musings.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}